So Gordon Brown thinks gambling should be taxed more to fund removal of the two-child benefit cap. Aside from the obvious heart-string tugging this is bad on multiple levels.
This is a classic example of a hypothecated taxes but at the end of the day it is just an excuse to get more cash for the pot. Fine in isolation but these things are never in isolation. Claiming this is taxing a supposed evil to fund a supposed need is dishonest as well as emotional blackmail.
I don’t “get” gambling and have no doubt that it is very harmful to significant sections of society but when people who talk about gambling being corrosive behaviour demand it be taxed rather than regulated if not outright banned, it is simply them thinking government should jump on the bandwagon of profiting from the damage it causes rather then preventing it. As with smoking it means government relies on people continuing with their destructive behaviour.
However the biggest problem is this is yet another case of the socialist delusion that the solution to everything is finding yet another pot of supposed “undertaxed” revenue and smashing it hard. Employers’ NI, school fees, the list goes on. No matter how it is dressed up it is the same old story all over again and again.
The bit about gambling enjoying a “complete exemption” from having VAT applied is another cynical sleight-of-hand because the VAT exemption applies when takings are already taxed via gambling duties. They are probably thinking of the situation with petrol where tax is paid on tax so they get even more by the back door.
Government is desperate for cash and this is just another in a growing line of excuses.